Abstract
The United Kingdom faces an urgent imperative to decarbonise its housing stock, with insulation upgrades and heat pump installations representing critical pathways toward net zero emissions. This dissertation synthesises existing literature to investigate the barriers preventing mass uptake of these retrofit measures in UK housing. Through systematic literature review, the research identifies four interconnected barrier categories: technical and fabric constraints, economic and financial challenges, supply chain and skills limitations, and policy and governance failures. Findings reveal that only approximately 11% of UK homes are currently heat pump-ready, despite around 50% being technically eligible for support schemes—an eligibility-readiness gap that exemplifies the complexity of retrofit delivery. High upfront costs, unfavourable electricity-to-gas price ratios, fragmented supply chains, and inconsistent policy frameworks compound these technical challenges. The analysis demonstrates that mass retrofit is blocked not by technological impossibility but by a misaligned socio-technical system requiring coordinated intervention. The dissertation concludes that effective scaling of retrofit programmes demands stable long-term policy, improved price signals, integrated whole-house delivery models, and targeted support for hard-to-treat and heritage properties.
Introduction
The decarbonisation of residential buildings represents one of the most significant challenges facing the United Kingdom in its pursuit of legally binding net zero emissions targets by 2050. The domestic housing sector accounts for approximately 17% of total UK carbon emissions, with space heating constituting the dominant energy demand within homes (Committee on Climate Change, 2019). Addressing this contribution requires transformative change in how homes are insulated and heated, moving away from fossil fuel dependence toward high-efficiency building envelopes served by low-carbon heating technologies.
The UK housing stock presents particular challenges for decarbonisation efforts. With approximately 29 million homes, the residential sector exhibits exceptional heterogeneity in age, construction type, tenure, and thermal performance. A substantial proportion of dwellings predate modern building regulations, featuring solid walls, single glazing, and minimal insulation—characteristics that render them thermally inefficient and difficult to retrofit cost-effectively. Furthermore, approximately 20% of the housing stock carries heritage designations or is located within conservation areas, constraining the application of standard retrofit measures on aesthetic and regulatory grounds (Wise, Moncaster and Jones, 2021).
Against this backdrop, government policy has increasingly emphasised two complementary interventions: fabric-first approaches prioritising insulation upgrades to reduce heat demand, and the deployment of heat pumps as low-carbon alternatives to gas boilers. The Climate Change Committee has identified the installation of 600,000 heat pumps annually by 2028 as essential to meeting carbon budgets, representing a dramatic acceleration from current installation rates of approximately 55,000 per year (Climate Change Committee, 2020). Simultaneously, millions of homes require substantial insulation improvements to achieve thermal efficiency standards compatible with heat pump operation and reduced energy consumption.
Despite clear technological solutions and policy ambitions, the rate of retrofit activity remains far below that required to meet decarbonisation targets. This implementation gap has attracted considerable academic attention, with researchers examining barriers from technical, economic, behavioural, and policy perspectives. Understanding why proven technologies fail to achieve mass uptake is essential for designing effective interventions and avoiding repeated policy failures.
This dissertation addresses this knowledge gap by synthesising existing literature on retrofit barriers, with particular emphasis on insulation measures and heat pump deployment. The research contributes to academic understanding of socio-technical transitions in the built environment whilst offering practical insights for policymakers, industry practitioners, and householders seeking to accelerate housing decarbonisation.
Aim and objectives
The overarching aim of this dissertation is to investigate and synthesise the barriers preventing mass uptake of insulation and heat pump technologies in UK housing, thereby identifying pathways toward accelerated retrofit delivery.
To achieve this aim, the following objectives guide the research:
1. To systematically review and categorise the technical barriers relating to housing stock characteristics and fabric constraints that impede retrofit uptake.
2. To analyse the economic and financial barriers affecting householder decision-making and market viability of retrofit measures.
3. To examine supply chain limitations, skills shortages, and delivery model constraints that restrict industry capacity to scale retrofit activity.
4. To evaluate the role of policy design, governance stability, and public awareness in shaping retrofit outcomes.
5. To synthesise findings across barrier categories to develop an integrated understanding of the socio-technical system constraining mass retrofit.
6. To identify evidence-based recommendations for overcoming identified barriers and accelerating retrofit delivery.
Methodology
This dissertation employs a literature synthesis methodology to investigate barriers to housing retrofit in the UK context. Literature synthesis represents an established approach for consolidating existing knowledge on complex, multidisciplinary topics where primary empirical research would be impractical or duplicative (Snyder, 2019). Given the extensive existing scholarship on retrofit barriers spanning technical, economic, social, and policy domains, synthesis enables comprehensive analysis drawing on diverse methodological traditions.
The research draws primarily on peer-reviewed academic literature published in English between 2012 and 2024, reflecting the period during which UK retrofit policy has undergone significant development and evaluation. Key journals consulted include Energy Policy, Energy Research and Social Science, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, and Buildings and Cities. These publications represent established outlets for research on building decarbonisation, energy transitions, and housing policy.
Source selection prioritised empirical studies examining UK-specific barriers, including quantitative analyses of retrofit economics, qualitative investigations of stakeholder perspectives, and mixed-methods evaluations of policy programmes. Theoretical and modelling studies were included where they offered insights into barrier dynamics or potential solutions. Grey literature from government sources, including the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, the Climate Change Committee, and UK Research and Innovation, supplemented academic sources where appropriate.
The analytical approach followed thematic synthesis principles, with barrier categories emerging inductively from the literature before being organised into a coherent framework. This framework distinguishes four primary barrier clusters: technical and fabric constraints; economic and financial challenges; supply chain and skills limitations; and policy and governance failures. Within each category, specific barriers were identified, their evidence base assessed, and their interactions with other categories examined.
Limitations of this methodology include reliance on published findings, which may exhibit publication bias toward negative results or specific disciplinary perspectives. The dynamic nature of policy environments means some findings may reflect historical rather than current conditions. Nevertheless, the synthesis approach enables comprehensive coverage of a complex topic while maintaining analytical rigour.
Literature review
Technical and fabric barriers
The physical characteristics of the UK housing stock constitute fundamental barriers to retrofit uptake. Research consistently identifies a significant gap between technical eligibility for support schemes and practical readiness for low-carbon heating installation. Lamb and Elmes (2024) demonstrate that while approximately 50% of homes meet eligibility criteria for the Boiler Upgrade Scheme, only around 11% are genuinely heat pump-ready, requiring no additional fabric improvements before installation. This eligibility-readiness gap reflects the inadequate thermal performance of most dwellings, where heat pump efficiency would be compromised without prior insulation upgrades.
Solid wall construction presents particular challenges. Approximately 8 million UK homes feature solid walls lacking cavities for conventional insulation, requiring either internal or external wall insulation at substantially higher cost and disruption (Dowson et al., 2012). Internal wall insulation reduces habitable floor area, requires extensive redecoration, and may introduce condensation risks if improperly installed. External wall insulation alters building appearance, raising aesthetic objections and planning constraints, particularly in heritage contexts. These factors render solid wall insulation among the least adopted retrofit measures despite its significant potential for thermal improvement (Lingard, 2020).
Hard-to-treat properties extend beyond solid walls to include non-standard construction types such as steel-framed, timber-framed, and concrete construction, each requiring specialist assessment and bespoke solutions. Glazing upgrades, while technically straightforward, involve substantial cost for whole-house replacement and may encounter heritage restrictions on window design. The cumulative effect is that deep retrofit achieving substantial carbon reductions remains technically complex and expensive for much of the housing stock (Alabid, Bennadji and Seddiki, 2022).
Heritage buildings warrant particular attention given their prevalence and protection status. Wise, Moncaster and Jones (2021) identify approximately 20% of UK housing as heritage-constrained, including listed buildings, properties in conservation areas, and those with historic architectural features. Standard retrofit measures including external wall insulation, window replacement, and visible renewable installations frequently conflict with heritage protection requirements, limiting available options and increasing costs for bespoke solutions. The tension between carbon reduction imperatives and heritage preservation creates regulatory uncertainty and deters both householders and contractors from pursuing retrofit in these properties.
Heat pump installation introduces additional technical requirements. Effective operation typically requires radiator upgrades or underfloor heating installation, hot water cylinder accommodation, and external unit placement with adequate spacing and noise considerations. Reguis, Vand and Currie (2021) highlight that transitioning to low-temperature heating systems demands comprehensive assessment of existing heating infrastructure and potential modifications, adding complexity and cost to installations. For dwellings with spatial constraints, inadequate electrical supply capacity, or unsuitable outdoor space, heat pump installation may prove impractical without substantial enabling works.
Economic and financial barriers
Financial considerations dominate householder decision-making regarding retrofit investments, with high upfront costs representing the most frequently cited barrier across multiple studies. Solid wall insulation typically costs £10,000–£25,000 per property depending on construction type and property size, while heat pump installations range from £7,000–£15,000 even with grant support (Dowson et al., 2012; Li et al., 2022). These capital requirements exceed the financial capacity or risk tolerance of many households, particularly in the absence of established financing mechanisms.
Payback periods compound capital cost barriers. Energy efficiency measures deliver value through reduced energy bills over time, but payback calculations for measures such as solid wall insulation and secondary glazing often extend beyond twenty years, exceeding typical household planning horizons and undermining investment appeal. Research demonstrates that householders exhibit strong preferences for shorter payback periods, typically favouring measures recovering costs within five to seven years (Lingard, 2020). This temporal mismatch between investment and return discourages adoption even where lifetime savings exceed costs.
The relative pricing of electricity and gas creates particular challenges for heat pump economics. Despite superior efficiency, heat pumps consume electricity priced approximately four times higher per kilowatt-hour than gas in the UK market. This price ratio substantially erodes operating cost advantages, with some householders experiencing higher running costs following heat pump installation compared to gas boiler operation. Installer surveys confirm that the electricity-gas price differential represents a primary barrier, undermining the economic case presented to potential customers (Lamb and Elmes, 2024; Kokoni and Leach, 2021).
Previous financing mechanisms have failed to overcome these economic barriers. The Green Deal, introduced in 2012 as the flagship policy for enabling energy efficiency investment through loans repaid via energy bills, attracted minimal uptake before its closure in 2015. Bergman and Foxon (2020) attribute this failure to fundamental design flaws, including interest rates exceeding commercial alternatives, the golden rule requirement that expected savings exceed repayments, and consumer reluctance to attach charges to their properties. Dowson et al. (2012) note that savings estimates underpinning the Green Deal were systematically overestimated, creating a mismatch between expected and realised benefits that damaged consumer confidence.
Consumer preference research consistently identifies grants and subsidies as substantially more effective than loan-based approaches in driving adoption. Li et al. (2022) and Peñasco (2024) demonstrate that direct financial support significantly increases adoption probabilities, particularly for high-cost measures where capital barriers are most acute. Survey evidence indicates strong preferences for simple, accessible finance with reduced administrative requirements, suggesting that complexity and bureaucracy in existing schemes compound financial barriers (Hesselink and Chappin, 2019).
Supply chain and skills barriers
The capacity of the installation industry to deliver retrofit at scale represents a critical constraint on uptake regardless of demand conditions. Installer surveys reveal limited capacity across the retrofit supply chain, with businesses reporting inability to meet existing demand and reluctance to expand operations given market uncertainty. Lamb and Elmes (2024) identify installer hesitancy to add whole-house retrofit services to existing business models, preferring to focus on individual measure installation rather than comprehensive property assessment and improvement coordination.
Skills shortages permeate the retrofit sector. Heat pump installation requires qualifications distinct from conventional gas boiler fitting, creating a transition challenge for the existing heating engineering workforce. Training capacity has not kept pace with policy ambitions, resulting in insufficient qualified installers to deliver targeted installation volumes. Lingard (2020) and Butt, Jones and Fuertes (2020) document widespread industry concern regarding labour availability, with skilled workers representing a binding constraint on business expansion.
The fragmented structure of the construction and building services industry compounds skills challenges. Retrofit delivery requires coordination across multiple trades including insulation, glazing, heating, ventilation, and electrical installation, yet these services typically operate through separate small businesses with limited integration. This fragmentation increases coordination costs, creates interface problems between different interventions, and prevents economies of scale in project delivery. Research consistently identifies the absence of effective whole-house delivery models as a structural barrier to comprehensive retrofit (Butt, Jones and Fuertes, 2020).
Regulatory compliance requirements add complexity to retrofit delivery. The Renewable Heat Incentive scheme, while providing financial support for heat pump installations, imposed stringent compliance and inspection requirements that installers found burdensome. Snape, Boait and Rylatt (2015) identify the hassle factor associated with complex programme rules as a significant deterrent, potentially pushing adoption past tipping points where uptake collapses despite positive economics. Day et al. (2024) note that energy analysis requirements for heat pump retrofits add technical complexity that many installers lack capacity to address competently.
Quality assurance concerns further constrain market development. Instances of poor installation quality, whether insulation installed incorrectly or heat pumps undersized for property heat loads, generate negative word-of-mouth and undermine consumer confidence. The performance gap between expected and realised savings following retrofit has been documented across multiple studies, attributable partly to installation quality and partly to occupant behaviour changes. These quality concerns create reluctance among both householders considering investment and contractors considering market entry.
Policy and governance barriers
The policy environment for housing retrofit in the UK exhibits chronic instability that undermines investment across the supply chain. Successive governments have introduced, modified, and withdrawn support schemes with limited continuity, creating uncertainty that deters long-term commitment from businesses, investors, and householders. Bergman and Foxon (2020) characterise UK retrofit policy as stop-start, with frequent scheme changes preventing the market stability necessary for sustained capacity building.
The Green Deal’s introduction and withdrawal exemplifies this instability, but the pattern extends across multiple policy domains. The Energy Company Obligation has undergone repeated revisions to targeting, measures, and delivery requirements. The Renewable Heat Incentive transitioned through multiple phases before closure, to be replaced by the Boiler Upgrade Scheme with different parameters and eligibility criteria. Feed-in Tariffs supporting solar photovoltaic installation were repeatedly reduced before closure. This policy churn creates a climate where businesses hesitate to invest in skills, equipment, and marketing given uncertainty about future market conditions (Alabid, Bennadji and Seddiki, 2022; Wise, Cooper and Eckert, 2024).
Short funding windows and rushed delivery requirements compromise retrofit quality. Schemes designed to stimulate rapid uptake—such as the Green Homes Grant voucher scheme introduced and largely withdrawn within eighteen months—force accelerated timelines incompatible with careful property assessment and tailored solution design. Fylan et al. (2016) document how delivery pressures under previous schemes led to poor matching between measures and properties, contributing to performance gaps and undermining householder trust. The absence of sustained, predictable funding prevents the development of mature delivery infrastructure capable of consistent quality.
Programme rules and administrative requirements create further barriers. Complex eligibility criteria, documentation requirements, and inspection processes impose transaction costs on both installers and householders. Evidence suggests that administrative burden disproportionately affects fuel-poor households lacking capacity to navigate complex application processes, potentially excluding those most in need of support (Fylan et al., 2016). Installer interviews confirm that bureaucratic requirements absorb significant resources, reducing profitability and deterring market participation (Butt, Jones and Fuertes, 2020).
Public awareness regarding retrofit options and requirements remains limited despite years of policy attention. Research indicates that homeowners exhibit low understanding of what heat pump-ready means in practice, underestimating the enabling works required before installation and the lifestyle adjustments accompanying heat pump operation. Lamb and Elmes (2024) find low willingness among householders to pay for preparatory fabric improvements without strong government support, reflecting both financial constraints and limited appreciation of their necessity. This awareness gap creates unrealistic expectations and subsequent disappointment, compounding trust deficits arising from previous scheme failures.
The interaction between policy instability and public trust warrants particular attention. Repeated scheme withdrawals, well-publicised programme failures, and inconsistent messaging from government have eroded public confidence in retrofit as a worthwhile investment. Research on the Green Deal’s failure highlights how negative publicity surrounding poor outcomes generated lasting reputational damage affecting subsequent initiatives (Bergman and Foxon, 2020). Rebuilding trust requires demonstrated policy commitment extending beyond electoral cycles, yet the political economy of housing retrofit makes such commitment difficult to achieve.
Discussion
The literature synthesis reveals that barriers to mass retrofit of UK housing operate not in isolation but as interconnected elements of a misaligned socio-technical system. Technical constraints create demand for expensive fabric improvements, economic barriers prevent householders from financing these improvements, supply chain limitations restrict delivery capacity, and policy instability deters investment in overcoming these constraints. Understanding these interactions is essential for designing effective interventions.
The eligibility-readiness gap as a systemic challenge
The identification of a substantial gap between scheme eligibility and heat pump readiness illuminates fundamental challenges in retrofit delivery. While half of UK homes may technically qualify for support, only one in nine is prepared for efficient heat pump operation without additional enabling works. This gap reflects the systematic underinvestment in fabric improvement over decades, leaving the housing stock inadequately prepared for low-carbon heating transition.
Addressing this gap requires reframing policy from single-measure support toward whole-house approaches ensuring fabric and heating interventions are appropriately sequenced and integrated. Current support mechanisms, designed around individual technologies rather than comprehensive property improvement, fragment the retrofit journey and leave householders navigating complex decisions with limited guidance. The fabric-first principle—prioritising insulation to reduce heat demand before installing low-carbon heating—enjoys widespread technical endorsement but limited policy implementation.
Economic signals and market failure
The electricity-gas price ratio emerges as a critical barrier undermining heat pump economics and requiring policy intervention beyond the retrofit sector itself. While energy taxation and pricing fall outside traditional housing policy domains, their effects on retrofit economics are profound. Heat pumps delivering three to four units of heat per unit of electricity consumed should demonstrate clear operating cost advantages over gas boilers, yet price differentials largely neutralise this efficiency benefit.
Policy responses to this market failure include direct subsidies to offset unfavourable economics, rebalancing of energy taxation to improve price signals, or acceptance that heat pump deployment will proceed primarily on environmental rather than economic grounds. Current approaches combining capital grants with unchanged energy pricing rely on householder willingness to accept higher running costs for environmental benefit—a proposition that research suggests enjoys limited appeal beyond motivated early adopters.
The failure of loan-based financing mechanisms reflects deeper challenges in applying market logic to retrofit investment. Energy efficiency improvements deliver diffuse benefits over extended timeframes, lack the tangible appeal of other home improvements, and involve uncertain savings dependent on occupant behaviour and energy prices. These characteristics render energy efficiency a poor candidate for consumer credit markets, explaining the Green Deal’s failure to stimulate demand despite theoretical economic rationality. Grant-based approaches, while fiscally costly, align better with household decision-making preferences.
Supply chain transformation requirements
Scaling retrofit delivery requires fundamental transformation of supply chain structures rather than incremental capacity expansion. The fragmented, trade-specific organisation of current installation services cannot efficiently deliver whole-house retrofit requiring coordinated multi-measure interventions. New business models integrating assessment, design, and installation across fabric and heating measures are required, yet market uncertainty deters the investment necessary to develop such models.
International evidence suggests that successful retrofit programmes typically involve intermediary organisations coordinating supply chains and providing quality assurance. One-stop-shop models, where householders engage a single entity responsible for managing comprehensive retrofit, reduce transaction costs and address coordination failures inherent in fragmented markets. Developing such intermediaries requires sustained policy support enabling business model innovation and market testing.
Skills development represents a necessary but insufficient condition for supply chain transformation. Training additional heat pump installers will not resolve delivery challenges if business models, coordination mechanisms, and quality assurance systems remain inadequate. An integrated workforce development strategy addressing technical skills alongside business capabilities and customer engagement competencies is required.
Policy design principles for effective intervention
The pattern of policy failure documented across multiple schemes suggests systematic design flaws rather than implementation accidents. Short-term funding commitments, complex eligibility rules, rushed delivery requirements, and inadequate monitoring have characterised successive initiatives, generating predictable failures while consuming political capital and public trust.
Effective retrofit policy requires fundamental reorientation toward stability, simplicity, and sustained commitment. Long-term funding frameworks extending across electoral cycles would enable supply chain investment with confidence. Simplified eligibility and application processes would reduce administrative barriers deterring participation. Adequate timescales for delivery would enable quality-focused implementation. Robust monitoring and evaluation would enable evidence-based programme refinement.
The targeting of support warrants careful consideration. Universal schemes risk subsidising relatively affluent households capable of self-financing, while targeted schemes impose administrative costs and may exclude borderline households. Fuel poverty considerations suggest prioritising support for low-income households facing greatest barriers and potential benefits, yet these households also present greatest delivery challenges given tenure patterns, property conditions, and engagement difficulties.
Heritage and hard-to-treat properties
The 20% of housing stock subject to heritage constraints requires particular attention given conventional measures’ inapplicability. Research on heritage retrofit remains limited, with most studies focusing on standard dwellings where technical solutions are better established. Developing heritage-appropriate retrofit approaches demands investment in research, demonstration projects, and training to build capacity for bespoke solutions.
Policy frameworks governing heritage properties may require modification to enable appropriate decarbonisation. Blanket restrictions on external alterations prevent effective retrofit of properties where internal insulation is impractical, yet wholesale relaxation risks inappropriate interventions damaging heritage value. Developing principles for proportionate heritage protection that enables decarbonisation while preserving significance represents an important area for regulatory development.
Achieving systemic change
The interconnection of barriers implies that addressing individual constraints in isolation will prove insufficient. Reducing capital costs matters little if supply chains cannot deliver installations. Expanding installer capacity achieves little if householders remain unable to finance improvements. Stable policy frameworks lose effectiveness if public awareness and trust remain low.
Effective intervention requires coordinated action across multiple domains simultaneously, addressing technical standards, financial mechanisms, supply chain development, skills training, public engagement, and policy stability as interdependent elements of a coherent strategy. Such coordination challenges conventional policy structures organised around departmental responsibilities, requiring sustained cross-government commitment and institutional innovation.
The scale of required transformation suggests that market-led approaches will prove insufficient without substantial and sustained government intervention. Retrofit delivers public goods through carbon reduction that private investment decisions inadequately capture. The market failures documented throughout this analysis—split incentives in rental properties, coordination failures across fragmented supply chains, information asymmetries affecting householder decisions, and externalities unpriced in energy markets—justify public intervention well beyond current levels.
Conclusions
This dissertation has investigated barriers preventing mass uptake of insulation and heat pump technologies in UK housing through systematic literature synthesis. The analysis reveals that retrofit faces not a single barrier requiring targeted intervention but a complex of interacting constraints spanning technical, economic, supply chain, and policy domains.
The first objective, examining technical barriers, identified the fundamental challenge posed by housing stock heterogeneity and inadequate fabric performance. The finding that only 11% of homes are heat pump-ready despite 50% eligibility demonstrates the scale of preparatory improvement required before low-carbon heating can be efficiently deployed. Hard-to-treat solid walls and heritage constraints affecting millions of properties compound these challenges.
The second objective, analysing economic barriers, documented the multiple financial constraints affecting householder decisions. High upfront costs, extended payback periods, and unfavourable electricity-gas price ratios collectively undermine the economic case for retrofit investment. Previous financing mechanisms, notably the Green Deal, failed to overcome these barriers, with grant-based approaches proving more effective at stimulating uptake.
The third objective, examining supply chain barriers, revealed fundamental limitations in industry capacity and structure. Skills shortages, fragmented trade organisation, and limited appetite for business model innovation constrain delivery regardless of demand conditions. Complex compliance requirements add bureaucratic burden deterring both installers and householders.
The fourth objective, evaluating policy barriers, identified chronic instability as the defining characteristic of UK retrofit governance. Stop-start schemes, short funding windows, and frequent rule changes prevent supply chain investment and erode public trust. Administrative complexity compounds these problems, creating transaction costs that deter participation.
The fifth objective sought synthesis across barrier categories, achieved through recognition that barriers operate as elements of a misaligned socio-technical system requiring coordinated intervention. Individual barrier removal will prove insufficient; systemic transformation addressing multiple constraints simultaneously is required.
The sixth objective, identifying recommendations, points toward stable long-term policy frameworks, improved price signals for low-carbon heating, whole-house delivery models integrating fabric and heating interventions, and targeted support for heritage and hard-to-treat properties. Implementation requires sustained cross-government commitment exceeding current approaches.
The significance of these findings extends beyond immediate policy relevance. Understanding why proven technologies fail to achieve mass uptake despite clear benefits contributes to broader scholarship on socio-technical transitions and the governance of decarbonisation. The UK experience offers lessons for other nations facing similar housing decarbonisation challenges.
Future research should address several identified gaps. Heritage retrofit approaches require substantially greater attention given the scale of constrained stock. Supply chain transformation pathways warrant empirical investigation to understand how integrated delivery models might emerge. Longitudinal studies tracking householder experiences through retrofit processes would illuminate behavioural and social dimensions inadequately captured in cross-sectional research. Comparative analysis with successful international programmes would identify transferable practices applicable to the UK context.
Mass retrofit of UK housing is blocked not by technological impossibility but by systemic barriers requiring systemic responses. The evidence synthesised in this dissertation demonstrates that scaling retrofit demands transformation across multiple domains—in housing itself, in markets delivering improvement, and in governance enabling change. Meeting this challenge represents one of the defining tasks of UK climate policy in the decades ahead.
References
Alabid, J., Bennadji, A. and Seddiki, M., 2022. A review on the energy retrofit policies and improvements of the UK existing buildings, challenges and benefits. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 155, 111875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112161
Bergman, N. and Foxon, T., 2020. Reframing policy for the energy efficiency challenge: Insights from housing retrofits in the United Kingdom. *Energy Research and Social Science*, 63, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101386
Butt, B., Jones, R. and Fuertes, A., 2020. Opportunities and barriers to business engagement in the UK domestic retrofit sector: An industry perspective. *Building Services Engineering Research and Technology*, 42(3), pp. 293-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624420975640
Climate Change Committee, 2019. *UK housing: Fit for the future?* London: Committee on Climate Change.
Climate Change Committee, 2020. *The Sixth Carbon Budget: The UK’s path to Net Zero*. London: Committee on Climate Change.
Day, T., Morris, K., Chaer, I. and Gillich, A., 2024. An energy analysis methodology for residential heat pump retrofits. *Building Services Engineering Research and Technology*, 46(2), pp. 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244241289521
Dowson, M., Poole, A., Harrison, D. and Susman, G., 2012. Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal. *Energy Policy*, 50, pp. 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.019
Fylan, F., Glew, D., Smith, M., Johnston, D., Brooke-Peat, M., Miles-Shenton, D., Fletcher, M., Aloise-Young, P. and Gorse, C., 2016. Reflections on retrofits: Overcoming barriers to energy efficiency among the fuel poor in the United Kingdom. *Energy Research and Social Science*, 21, pp. 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.002
Hesselink, L. and Chappin, É., 2019. Adoption of energy efficient technologies by households – Barriers, policies and agent-based modelling studies. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 99, pp. 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.031
Kokoni, S. and Leach, M., 2021. Policy mechanisms to support heat pump deployment: A UK case study based on techno-economic modelling. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition*, 1, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100009
Lamb, N. and Elmes, D., 2024. Increasing heat pump adoption: analysing multiple perspectives on preparing homes for heat pumps in the UK. *Carbon Neutrality*, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-024-00084-w
Li, X., Arbabi, H., Bennett, G., Oreszczyn, T. and Tingley, D., 2022. Net zero by 2050: Investigating carbon-budget compliant retrofit measures for the English housing stock. *Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews*, 161, 112384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112384
Lingard, J., 2020. Residential retrofit in the UK: The optimum retrofit measures necessary for effective heat pump use. *Building Services Engineering Research and Technology*, 42(3), pp. 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624420975707
Peñasco, C., 2024. From policy to practice: The role of national policy instruments and social barriers in UK energy efficiency adoption in households. *Energy Policy*, 193, 114308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114308
Reguis, A., Vand, B. and Currie, J., 2021. Challenges for the Transition to Low-Temperature Heat in the UK: A Review. *Energies*, 14(21), 7181. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217181
Snape, J., Boait, P. and Rylatt, R., 2015. Will domestic consumers take up the renewable heat incentive? An analysis of the barriers to heat pump adoption using agent-based modelling. *Energy Policy*, 85, pp. 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.008
Snyder, H., 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. *Journal of Business Research*, 104, pp. 333-339.
Wise, F., Cooper, A. and Eckert, C., 2024. A Transdisciplinary Engineering and Systems Approach for Decarbonizing UK Home Heating. *Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering*, 52, pp. 359-368. https://doi.org/10.3233/atde240880
Wise, F., Moncaster, A. and Jones, D., 2021. Rethinking retrofit of residential heritage buildings. *Buildings and Cities*, 2(1), pp. 495-517. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.94
