Abstract
The United Kingdom’s offshore wind sector represents a cornerstone of national energy security and decarbonisation strategy, yet the extent to which economic value remains within domestic borders depends critically upon deliberate policy intervention. This dissertation synthesises existing literature to examine the mechanisms that effectively retain jobs, gross value added, and supply chain activity within the UK offshore wind industry. Through systematic literature review, this study evaluates four principal mechanisms: local content procurement strategies, the differentiated application of content rules across component types, industrial ecosystem development through port and cluster investments, and comprehensive policy design beyond rhetorical commitments. Findings indicate that raising UK content from approximately 40 per cent to 52 per cent can increase cumulative gross value added from £19 billion to £26 billion whilst supporting over 410,000 full-time equivalent positions. However, evidence reveals that stringent local content requirements paradoxically discourage domestic sourcing of complex, high-value components. The research concludes that effective value retention requires alignment between Contracts for Difference mechanisms, port infrastructure investment, skills development, and targeted manufacturing support, rather than reliance upon generic supply chain commitments.
Introduction
The United Kingdom has positioned offshore wind energy as central to achieving its legally binding net-zero emissions target by 2050 and its interim clean power objectives. Recent auction rounds under the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme have awarded contracts for substantial new offshore wind capacity, framed explicitly around clean power targets and enhanced energy security. The political and economic narrative accompanying these developments consistently emphasises the creation of domestic jobs and the strengthening of local supply chains. However, beneath these aspirational pronouncements lies a more complex reality regarding the mechanisms through which economic value is genuinely retained within national borders.
The expansion of offshore wind capacity carries significant implications beyond environmental outcomes. Energy infrastructure investments of this magnitude represent substantial capital deployment, with decisions regarding component sourcing, manufacturing location, and service provision determining whether associated economic benefits accrue domestically or flow to international competitors. The tension between achieving lowest-cost deployment and maximising domestic economic returns presents policymakers with challenging trade-offs that require evidence-based resolution.
This topic warrants rigorous academic examination for several interconnected reasons. Firstly, the scale of planned investment—the UK aims to achieve 50 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity by 2030—means that even marginal improvements in domestic content can yield substantial absolute economic gains. Secondly, coastal and post-industrial communities that host offshore wind infrastructure often face structural economic challenges; understanding how value retention mechanisms function could inform place-based industrial policy. Thirdly, international experience demonstrates considerable variation in outcomes, suggesting that policy design rather than technological determinism shapes economic distribution. Finally, the credibility of the broader energy transition depends partly upon delivering tangible local benefits to communities affected by infrastructure development.
The contemporary policy context heightens the urgency of this analysis. Warnings regarding cost escalation, grid connection challenges, and delivery risks accompany each new CfD allocation round. Simultaneously, concerns about supply chain resilience, particularly following disruptions experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical instability, have renewed interest in domestic manufacturing capability. Understanding which mechanisms actually deliver promised benefits—as opposed to those that merely generate favourable headlines—is essential for evidence-based policymaking.
Aim and objectives
The primary aim of this dissertation is to critically evaluate the mechanisms through which economic value from offshore wind development can be retained within the United Kingdom, distinguishing between effective policy interventions and rhetorical commitments that fail to deliver substantive domestic benefits.
To achieve this aim, the following objectives have been established:
1. To examine the relationship between local content levels in offshore wind capital expenditure and resulting domestic economic impacts, including employment and gross value added.
2. To analyse how local content procurement rules function differently across various component categories, distinguishing between standardised market-type goods and complex relational supply relationships.
3. To evaluate the role of industrial ecosystems, including port infrastructure, manufacturing clusters, and skills development, in anchoring long-term economic value within specific UK regions.
4. To assess the effectiveness of existing UK policy frameworks, including the Supply Chain Plan requirements, in achieving genuine manufacturing and supply chain development beyond non-manufacturing service activities.
5. To synthesise findings into actionable policy recommendations that can inform future CfD rounds and broader industrial strategy for the offshore wind sector.
Methodology
This dissertation employs a systematic literature synthesis methodology to address the stated research objectives. Given the multifaceted nature of the research questions—spanning economics, industrial policy, regional development, and energy systems—a comprehensive review of existing empirical and theoretical literature provides the most appropriate methodological approach.
The literature search strategy encompassed multiple academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, alongside grey literature from government departments, industry bodies, and international organisations. Search terms combined offshore wind terminology with economic impact indicators, policy mechanisms, and geographic qualifiers. Initial searches yielded substantial material, which was subsequently filtered according to relevance, methodological rigour, and publication quality.
The selection criteria prioritised peer-reviewed journal articles published in recognised outlets, supplemented by government reports and official statistics where these provided essential contextual data. Studies employing rigorous quantitative methods, including input-output analysis, computable general equilibrium modelling, and econometric analysis, received particular attention given their capacity to quantify economic relationships. Qualitative research examining policy implementation processes and stakeholder perspectives complemented these quantitative sources.
The analytical framework organised findings according to four thematic categories corresponding to the principal mechanisms identified in preliminary scoping: local content and procurement strategy, the differentiated effects of content rules, industrial ecosystem development, and policy design characteristics. Within each category, findings were synthesised to identify areas of consensus, contradiction, and remaining uncertainty.
This methodological approach carries inherent limitations. Literature synthesis depends upon the quality and coverage of existing research, potentially perpetuating gaps or biases in primary studies. The preponderance of UK-focused research, whilst appropriate given the dissertation’s geographic scope, limits generalisability. Additionally, the rapidly evolving nature of the offshore wind sector means that some findings from earlier studies may not fully reflect current market conditions. These limitations are acknowledged whilst maintaining that synthesis of available evidence provides the most robust basis for addressing the research questions.
Literature review
### The economic significance of local content levels
The relationship between local content in offshore wind capital expenditure and domestic economic outcomes has received substantial scholarly attention. Allan et al. (2020) demonstrate through computable general equilibrium modelling that higher UK content directly increases both gross domestic product and employment, generating what they term “double dividends” that complement rather than compromise emissions reduction objectives. Their analysis indicates that UK offshore wind development can deliver substantial domestic economic benefits, but only when policy and procurement deliberately shape where capital goods, services, and manufacturing activities locate.
Quantitative estimates of these relationships provide compelling evidence for the scale of potential benefits. Modelling conducted by Allan et al. (2020) shows that raising UK content from approximately 40 per cent under a “passive” developer approach to 52 per cent under “active” supply chain engagement would increase cumulative gross value added from roughly £19 billion to £26 billion for a large build-out scenario. Employment impacts similarly escalate, with job creation rising from approximately 310,000 to over 410,000 full-time equivalent positions across the investment period.
Earlier work by Allan et al. (2021) developed novel methodological approaches to estimate economic activity supported by offshore wind, employing hypothetical extraction analysis within an input-output framework. Their findings indicate that UK offshore wind in 2010 already supported approximately 10,240 jobs, predominantly in medium and high-skill categories. The research demonstrates that increasing local content from around 28 per cent toward approximately 48 per cent would substantially lift domestic economic impact, reinforcing the sensitivity of outcomes to content decisions.
Regional disaggregation of these impacts reveals important distributional considerations. Connolly (2020) focuses specifically on Scotland, finding that regional economic impacts depend critically upon the location of port facilities, fabrication capacity, and service firms. Where these elements cluster within Scottish regions, economic multiplier effects strengthen considerably. The research emphasises that aggregate national figures can obscure substantial variation in how benefits distribute across constituent territories.
### Differentiated effects of local content rules
While the case for local content appears straightforward at an aggregate level, more nuanced research reveals important complexity in how content rules actually function. Van Der Loos et al. (2022) provide particularly valuable insights through their analysis of over 12,000 supplier contracts across European offshore wind projects. Their findings demonstrate that developers operating under local content pressure do indeed source more locally, but this effect varies systematically according to component characteristics.
The distinction between “market-type” and “relational” supply relationships proves crucial. For standardised goods and services that can be specified precisely and sourced through competitive tendering, local content rules effectively increase domestic sourcing. However, for complex components requiring ongoing collaboration, tacit knowledge exchange, and relationship-specific investments, the picture differs markedly. In the UK specifically, Van Der Loos et al. (2022) find that strict local content incentives paradoxically made local developers less likely to utilise local high-value relational suppliers, instead favouring cheaper global alternatives for these complex segments.
This counterintuitive finding has significant policy implications. The research suggests that local content rules should be designed to build volume in simpler market-type segments where domestic suppliers can compete effectively, whilst allowing greater flexibility in complex segments. For sophisticated components and engineering services, cultivating local lead developers and granting them procurement freedom appears more effective than rigid content mandates.
Larkin, Carr, and Klocker (2023), examining the Australian context but with relevance to UK experience, similarly emphasise the importance of distinguishing between component categories and capability levels when designing industrial policy for offshore wind. Their research identifies constraints at the regional scale that limit the effectiveness of generic content requirements applied uniformly across all segments.
### Industrial ecosystems and cluster development
The physical infrastructure requirements of offshore wind—particularly ports capable of handling large components—create opportunities for place-based economic development. Kosek et al. (2025) examine offshore wind farm supply chains and regional development in the Central Baltic region, finding that strategic port investments can transform coastal locations into operations and maintenance hubs whilst anchoring broader manufacturing activities. Their analysis of ports’ economic and logistical roles demonstrates how infrastructure decisions create path dependencies that shape long-term regional development trajectories.
UK-specific evidence supports these findings. Glasson et al. (2022) investigate local socioeconomic impacts of offshore wind farms, identifying ports and clusters such as Grimsby and Hull as increasingly important hubs for operations, maintenance, and manufacturing. Their research employs environmental impact assessment methodologies to trace how offshore wind development generates employment and supplier relationships that persist well beyond construction phases. Critically, they emphasise that long-term jobs and supplier bases become “locked in” through these cluster investments, creating durable regional economic restructuring.
The interaction between emerging offshore wind clusters and existing industrial capabilities shapes development pathways. Vanino, Siddall, and Rupp (2023) examine the relationship between renewable energy transition and local economic development in lagging regions, finding that impacts are largest where port facilities, fabrication capacity, and service firms are locally embedded. Particularly important is their finding that clusters building upon existing heavy industry or oil and gas capabilities achieve stronger outcomes, suggesting that industrial path dependency can be leveraged rather than simply overcome.
Giampieri, Ling-Chin, and Roskilly (2023) extend this analysis to emerging offshore wind-to-hydrogen scenarios, conducting techno-economic assessment of UK case studies. Their research indicates that integrated energy system approaches may create additional opportunities for regional value retention, though realising these benefits depends upon coordinated industrial policy.
### Skills development and workforce formation
Human capital constraints represent a potentially binding limitation on domestic value retention. Glasson et al. (2022) emphasise that skills and training pipelines, coordinated at regional level, are critical for capturing high-value activities. Without adequately trained workforces, high-value engineering and manufacturing work inevitably migrates to established foreign clusters with available expertise.
D’Amico et al. (2017) examine purchasing and supply management practices in offshore wind supply chains, identifying workforce capabilities as key success factors. Their research demonstrates that skills gaps constrain domestic suppliers’ ability to compete for contracts even when local content requirements ostensibly favour them. The interaction between skills availability and procurement decisions creates feedback loops that can either reinforce or undermine domestic capability development.
Larkin, Carr, and Klocker (2023) similarly stress workforce development constraints, noting that regional labour markets may lack sufficient depth in specialised skills to support rapid sectoral expansion. Their analysis suggests that effective local content policies must be accompanied by coordinated skills investment to avoid creating bottlenecks that drive work overseas.
### Policy framework effectiveness
Evaluation of existing UK policy frameworks reveals mixed outcomes. The 2014 Supply Chain Plan requirements introduced obligations for developers to demonstrate commitment to UK content as a condition of CfD eligibility. Leseure, Onyeocha, and Robins (2024) assess whether such policies can create supply chains where none previously existed, finding that the Supply Chain Plan did increase reported local content but that much of this gain occurred in non-manufacturing activities. Core turbine manufacturing—nacelles, blades, and other high-value components—remains largely imported despite policy interventions.
Earlier analysis by Leseure, Cooper, and Robins (2014) identified structural constraints limiting policy effectiveness, including the difficulty of developing manufacturing capabilities in the absence of existing industrial base and the competitive advantages enjoyed by established European manufacturers. Their research presaged subsequent findings regarding the limitations of content rules applied to complex manufacturing segments.
Karlsen (2018) provides valuable perspective through discourse analysis of offshore wind industrialisation narratives. Their research demonstrates how policy framing around “local benefits” can diverge from substantive outcomes, with rhetorical commitments substituting for effective mechanisms. The distinction between performative policy announcements and actual industrial development proves important for understanding implementation gaps.
Glasson et al. (2022) emphasise that effective policy requires monitoring actual versus promised local benefits across the entire project lifecycle, not merely construction phases. Operations and maintenance activities, which extend for 25 years or more, represent substantial long-term economic value that requires separate policy attention. Similarly, Vanino, Siddall, and Rupp (2023) stress the importance of long, predictable project pipelines that provide sufficient demand certainty for domestic suppliers to justify capability investments.
Discussion
The evidence synthesised in this review illuminates both the substantial potential and the considerable complexity of retaining offshore wind value within the UK economy. Several key findings emerge that warrant detailed discussion in relation to the stated research objectives.
### The magnitude and sensitivity of domestic economic impacts
The first objective sought to examine relationships between local content levels and domestic economic impacts. The literature provides compelling quantitative evidence that these relationships are both significant and highly sensitive to content decisions. The differential between passive and active supply chain scenarios—representing content levels of 40 per cent versus 52 per cent—yields GVA increases from £19 billion to £26 billion and employment gains from 310,000 to over 410,000 FTE positions. These are not marginal differences; they represent transformational impacts for the UK industrial base and regional economies hosting offshore wind activities.
However, the literature also reveals important nuances. Allan et al. (2020, 2021) demonstrate that these “double dividend” outcomes—simultaneous economic and environmental benefits—do not occur automatically. They require deliberate policy intervention to shape procurement decisions that would otherwise follow lowest-cost logic potentially favouring international suppliers. The counterfactual of market-driven procurement suggests that without policy intervention, a substantial proportion of capital expenditure would flow to established manufacturing centres in Denmark, Germany, and increasingly Asia.
The employment characteristics identified in the literature—predominantly medium and high-skill positions—have implications beyond simple job counts. Such employment offers pathways to sustainable livelihoods in regions often characterised by low-skill service sector dominance following deindustrialisation. This quality dimension strengthens the case for policy intervention whilst also highlighting the skills constraints discussed below.
### The paradox of local content rules
The second objective addressed the differentiated functioning of local content rules across component categories. Van Der Loos et al.’s (2022) finding that strict content requirements paradoxically reduce local sourcing of complex components represents a crucial insight with significant policy implications. This counterintuitive outcome can be understood through the lens of transaction cost economics: complex, relational supply relationships require trust, tacit knowledge, and relationship-specific investments that may not exist in nascent domestic supply bases.
When developers face rigid content requirements for such components, they may respond by seeking to minimise risk through engagement with known international suppliers who can meet specifications reliably, rather than investing in developing uncertain domestic relationships. The compliance focus shifts attention from capability building to target achievement, potentially undermining the policy’s developmental intent.
This finding suggests that optimal policy design should differentiate between component categories. For standardised market-type goods—cables, foundations, installation services—local content rules can effectively redirect procurement toward domestic suppliers capable of competing on quality and price. For complex relational goods—turbine nacelles, advanced blades, sophisticated control systems—alternative approaches may prove more effective. These might include supporting local lead developers who possess both capability and incentive to develop domestic supply relationships, rather than mandating content levels for components where domestic capability remains nascent.
The policy implication is uncomfortable for those seeking simple solutions: effective value retention requires nuanced, component-specific strategies rather than uniform content mandates. Generic “jobs and local supply chain” commitments that fail to acknowledge this complexity are unlikely to deliver promised benefits in high-value segments.
### The anchoring role of ports and clusters
The third objective evaluated industrial ecosystem development, where the literature provides strong evidence that place-based investments create durable value retention mechanisms. Ports capable of handling offshore wind components represent significant sunk costs that anchor supply chain activities geographically. Once established, these facilities generate agglomeration effects that attract additional investment, creating self-reinforcing cluster dynamics.
The UK examples of Grimsby and Hull illustrate these dynamics. Initial port investments attracted operations and maintenance facilities, which in turn drew supplier networks seeking proximity to customers. Manufacturing activities followed, benefiting from shared infrastructure and labour markets. Glasson et al.’s (2022) emphasis on “locking in” long-run jobs and supplier bases through such investments captures the path-dependent nature of these processes.
The interaction between offshore wind clusters and existing industrial capabilities—particularly oil and gas—deserves particular attention. Vanino, Siddall, and Rupp (2023) find that clusters building upon existing heavy industry capabilities achieve stronger outcomes, suggesting that industrial transition strategies should leverage rather than ignore legacy competencies. Scotland’s positioning illustrates this potential, with oil and gas expertise in areas such as subsea engineering, offshore logistics, and marine construction offering transferable capabilities for offshore wind.
However, skills constraints can limit cluster potential. Glasson et al.’s (2022) emphasis on coordinated regional skills pipelines acknowledges that physical infrastructure alone is insufficient; human capital must develop alongside industrial capacity. The feedback loop between skills availability and procurement decisions means that underinvestment in workforce development constrains domestic suppliers’ ability to compete, which in turn limits returns to skills investment—a potential vicious circle requiring policy intervention to break.
### Policy effectiveness and implementation gaps
The fourth objective assessed existing policy framework effectiveness. The findings reveal a concerning gap between policy rhetoric and substantive outcomes. The Supply Chain Plan increased reported local content, but Leseure, Onyeocha, and Robins’ (2024) finding that gains concentrated in non-manufacturing activities suggests that UK policy has struggled to develop domestic manufacturing capability in high-value segments. Core turbine manufacturing remains largely imported despite a decade of policy intervention.
Several factors explain this implementation gap. First, the competitive advantages of established European manufacturers—scale economies, accumulated learning, established supplier relationships—create substantial barriers to entry for UK aspirants. Second, the project-based nature of offshore wind procurement creates demand volatility that discourages long-term manufacturing investment. Third, monitoring and enforcement mechanisms have focused on reported content rather than verified outcomes across project lifecycles.
Karlsen’s (2018) discourse analysis illuminates how policy framing can substitute for substantive action. Political incentives favour announcements that claim future benefits over rigorous assessment of delivered outcomes. The “jobs and local supply chain” narrative serves political purposes regardless of whether mechanisms exist to deliver promised results. This observation should prompt academic and policy communities to maintain critical scrutiny of claims regarding offshore wind economic benefits.
The literature consistently emphasises long, predictable project pipelines as essential for domestic capability development. Suppliers cannot justify manufacturing investments based on single project awards; they require visibility of future demand over periods sufficient to amortise capital expenditure and develop competitive capabilities. The stop-start nature of UK offshore wind policy—with auction rounds cancelled or redesigned in response to cost concerns—undermines the demand certainty that effective industrial development requires.
### Synthesis and policy implications
Integrating these findings suggests that effective value retention requires coordinated intervention across multiple policy domains. CfD mechanisms alone cannot deliver domestic economic benefits; they must be aligned with port infrastructure investment, skills development, and targeted manufacturing support. The distinction between market-type and relational components implies differentiated policy approaches for different supply chain segments.
For market-type components, local content rules can effectively redirect procurement toward domestic suppliers, building scale and experience that supports capability development. For relational components, supporting local lead developers and providing flexibility in procurement may prove more effective than rigid content mandates. Across both categories, long-term demand visibility through predictable project pipelines is essential.
Industrial ecosystem development requires sustained commitment to port infrastructure, skills pipelines, and cluster coordination. The evidence suggests that coastal and post-industrial regions can capture substantial benefits, but only through deliberate policy attention that extends beyond construction phases to encompass operations, maintenance, and eventual decommissioning.
Conclusions
This dissertation set out to critically evaluate mechanisms for retaining offshore wind economic value within the United Kingdom. The synthesis of available literature enables conclusions regarding each stated objective.
Regarding the first objective, the evidence conclusively demonstrates that local content levels substantially determine domestic economic impacts. The sensitivity is considerable: a 12 percentage point increase in content can yield additional GVA of £7 billion and over 100,000 additional jobs for a major build-out. These figures establish the economic significance of procurement decisions and justify policy intervention to shape outcomes.
The second objective, examining differentiated effects of content rules, reveals important complexity that undermines simple policy prescriptions. Local content requirements effectively increase domestic sourcing for standardised components but paradoxically discourage local procurement of complex high-value segments in the UK context. This finding necessitates component-specific policy approaches rather than uniform content mandates.
For the third objective, evidence strongly supports the anchoring role of ports and industrial clusters in creating durable value retention mechanisms. Investments in facilities at locations such as Grimsby and Hull generate path dependencies that lock in long-term employment and supplier relationships. The interaction with existing industrial capabilities, particularly oil and gas, offers opportunities to leverage legacy competencies for emerging sectors.
Addressing the fourth objective, assessment of existing UK policy frameworks reveals significant implementation gaps. The Supply Chain Plan increased reported content but gains concentrated in non-manufacturing activities whilst core turbine manufacturing remains imported. Effective policy requires long, predictable project pipelines, monitoring of actual outcomes across project lifecycles, and integration between CfD mechanisms, infrastructure investment, and skills development.
The fifth objective sought actionable policy recommendations, which can now be articulated. Future CfD rounds should incorporate differentiated content requirements calibrated to component characteristics, apply stricter requirements for market-type segments whilst permitting flexibility for relational components, and support local lead developers who can cultivate domestic supply relationships organically. Port and cluster investments should receive sustained commitment extending beyond individual project timescales. Skills pipelines require regional coordination to prevent human capital constraints from limiting domestic capability development. Monitoring frameworks should track actual delivered content across project lifecycles rather than accepting developer promises at face value.
The significance of these findings extends beyond the offshore wind sector. As the UK pursues broader industrial strategy objectives, the mechanisms identified here—nuanced content rules, cluster development, skills coordination, demand visibility—offer transferable lessons for other capital-intensive sectors. The tension between lowest-cost deployment and domestic value retention will recur across clean energy investments; understanding how to navigate this tension effectively has implications for national economic strategy.
Future research should address several identified gaps. Longitudinal studies tracking actual content outcomes against Supply Chain Plan commitments would enable empirical assessment of policy effectiveness. Comparative analysis of content rule designs across European jurisdictions could identify optimal calibrations for different component categories. Research examining skill formation pathways and labour market dynamics within offshore wind clusters would inform workforce development strategies. Finally, investigation of emerging technologies—floating offshore wind, offshore wind-to-hydrogen—should assess whether findings regarding fixed-bottom installations transfer to these developing segments.
In conclusion, the “jobs and local supply chain” promises accompanying UK offshore wind expansion can be fulfilled, but only through deliberate, sophisticated policy intervention. Generic commitments divorced from effective mechanisms will not deliver domestic economic benefits at the scale that investment magnitudes might suggest. Policymakers face genuine choices regarding whether to prioritise lowest-cost deployment or domestic value retention, and regarding how to balance these objectives across different supply chain segments. The evidence reviewed here provides a foundation for making those choices on an informed basis.
References
Allan, G., Comerford, D., Connolly, K., McGregor, P. and Ross, A., 2020. The economic and environmental impacts of UK offshore wind development: The importance of local content. *Energy*, 199, 117436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117436
Allan, G., Connolly, K., McGregor, P. and Ross, A., 2021. A new method to estimate the economic activity supported by offshore wind: A hypothetical extraction study for the United Kingdom. *Wind Energy*, 24(6), pp. 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2607
Connolly, K., 2020. The regional economic impacts of offshore wind energy developments in Scotland. *Renewable Energy*, 160, pp. 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.065
D’Amico, F., Mogre, R., Clarke, S., Lindgreen, A. and Hingley, M., 2017. How purchasing and supply management practices affect key success factors: The case of the offshore-wind supply chain. *Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing*, 32(2), pp. 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-10-2014-0210
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, 2023. *Contracts for Difference Allocation Round 5: Results*. London: HMSO.
Giampieri, A., Ling-Chin, J. and Roskilly, A., 2023. Techno-economic assessment of offshore wind-to-hydrogen scenarios: A UK case study. *International Journal of Hydrogen Energy*, 48(5), pp. 1774-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.346
Glasson, J., Durning, B., Welch, K. and Olorundami, T., 2022. The local socio-economic impacts of offshore wind farms. *Environmental Impact Assessment Review*, 95, 106783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106783
Karlsen, A., 2018. Framing industrialization of the offshore wind value chain – A discourse approach to an event. *Geoforum*, 88, pp. 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.018
Kosek, W., Woźniak, W., Chamier-Gliszczynski, N. and Staniuk, W., 2025. Offshore wind farm supply chains and regional development: The role of ports in economic and logistical growth in the Central Baltic Region. *Energies*, 18(10), 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102599
Larkin, N., Carr, C. and Klocker, N., 2023. Building an offshore wind sector in Australia: economic opportunities and constraints at the regional scale. *Australian Geographer*, 55(1), pp. 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2023.2276144
Leseure, M., Cooper, D. and Robins, D., 2014. Supply chain, sustainability, and industrial policy – the case of the UK offshore wind energy supply chain. *Proceedings of the British Academy of Management Conference 2014*. Belfast: BAM.
Leseure, M., Onyeocha, C. and Robins, D., 2024. Stimulating investments in manufacturing: can policy create supply chains from a void? *Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management*, 35(1), pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0479
Van Der Loos, A., Langeveld, R., Hekkert, M., Negro, S. and Truffer, B., 2022. Developing local industries and global value chains: The case of offshore wind. *Technological Forecasting and Social Change*, 174, 121248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121248
Vanino, E., Siddall, T. and Rupp, W., 2023. Renewable energy transition and the local economic development of lagging-behind regions: Evidence from the offshore wind energy industry in the UK. *International Journal of Population Data Science*, 8(2), 2304. https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2304
